Appetite

R&D

Our R&D section features two kinds of work: deeply-researched dishes from our chef’s tasting menu which changes twice a year; and improvisational dishes from our weekly omakase  menu.

Cheong fun

R&D

A Cantonese crepe roll made of rice noodles, cheong fun plays a crucial role in the development of noodle-based dishes in China, Central Asia, and Europe.

Nouri’s team began by identifying  similar rice-based noodles throughout Southeast Asia— Malaysian petis udang, Vietnamese bánh cuốn, Thai khao phan— but surprisingly none in northwest China. 

This is because northwest China has few natural water resources compared to southeast China. As a result, farmers in the north plant wheat, a drought-resistant crop, instead of rice, a water-intensive plant. Our team understood that while ingredients may change to accommodate geographic limitations, techniques can remain the same. In other words, noodles remained a food item as people moved westward, in wheat instead of rice. 

Ancestors of contemporary Turks have their roots in northwest China. After the Tang Dynasty of the 10th century, Turks began to immigrate westward, from Turkestan and what is now Mongolia towards Eastern Europe, the Iranian plateau, and Anatolia and modern Turkey. The main migration occurred between the 11th and 15th centuries along the Silk Road.

Northern China has since then existed in the realm of Turkic influence. Both economies are based on the foundations of animal husbandry and wheat culture, and their foods reflect shared traits. For instance, historian Paul Buell argues that the etymological origin of baklava, a Turkish dessert of filo filled with chopped nuts, is the Mongolian root baγla, which means ‘to wrap up or to pile up’. Güllaç is another Turkish dessert made with milk, pomegranate and wheat flour; its first known mention is in a 14th-century book, Yinshan Zhenyao, a food and health manual written by a Chinese physician in Mongol courts. 

Methodology

Our research and development methodology at Nouri is structured, but we always leave room for improvisation. We follow research guidelines but are willing to break them if the work demands it. Our primary mandate is always creative.

We begin with a specific kind of pattern recognition. Drawing on the vocational strength of our chefs, we identify similarities in ingredient, technique, or flavour of dishes from around the world. How does a mole from Mexico resemble a red curry from Thailand? Why do Peruvians cure their fish in the same way as Pacific Islanders? We are able to ask these questions because our chefs taste these questions. Taste— which can be dismissed as a subjective experience in amateurs— is a rigorous tool at the disposal of our professional chefs. It frames and guides our research questions.

We then conduct preliminary historical research to determine whether the patterns we identify are the result of mutually independent development or cultural exchange. When an ingredient is found around the world, we often see similar methods of use. Liquorice is an example. More often, we recognise similarities because of cultural exchange. Food travels across boundaries and between cultures through trade, war, migration, etc. As a result, each culture adopts the ingredient or technique, featuring certain elements of the culture from which it received it, and imbuing the item with new features, too. Chili pepper is an excellent case study of an ingredient that has transformed the cuisines of South America, Europe, Southeast Asia, and South Asia.

Our chefs begin their development process with these initial observations.

Then, we approach relevant experts— sometimes regional historians, other times anthropologists, sociologists, linguists, economists, etc.— to validate, and sometimes challenge, our hypotheses. They provide access to primary source materials that help us map the lineage of a specific food item as it travels across cultures. This step is essential to our crossroads approach to food; it allows us to work with products or techniques that are verifiably shared by people globally.

We also partner with chemists and food scientists to examine the molecular structures of the foods we think share common origins or features. On our menu, we serve a rice stem dish that draws on the shared flavour profiles of a south Indian buttermilk and a Norman sauce dieppoise; this link is confirmed scientifically and culturally. 

Our final output is an original dish that is conceptually related to food traditions from around the world without being traditional. It is innovative without ignoring historical influences. It fulfils the requirements of a complete dish in terms of taste, texture, and style, but also paves the way for a broader engagement with global culture.

Beyond food 

Crossroads thinking was born out of a desire to think more deeply and critically about culture and globalisation. A focus on food was incidental— we just happened to be chefs and/or working in the culinary industry. Crossroads was an epistemological position before it was a cooking philosophy.

Today, we collaborate with architects, fashion designers, and visual artists to expand their practices with a detailed study of cross-cultural interaction and influence.